azsteve Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > 1.) According to Dallen Oakes and by the example > that the mormon church has lived by since its > founding, the church will not apologize ever.
With their calling an election made sure apologies are impossible. Anyone caught apologizing with their CEMS(calling and election made sure) is a sure sign that they have lost their celestial certification.
> 2.) Who in their right mind would ever risk > damaging a half-trillion dollar money machine? > > 3.) The church leaders don't care if God approves > or not. They've got their calling and election > made sure and they'll do what they damn well > please.
Having your CEMS is requisite by God because God will not buy stocks. Elohim is too good for money so he grants His servants a CEMS certifying them able to get their hands dirty with money and still be considered clean.
First off the Mormon church is an inamate object. It is legally a corporation not a human. It can neither think,talk, reason,sing, not act. However, the peole who have taken power within the organization can and do. so if in their arrogance they refuse to apologize for unbecomming actions let the sin be on their heads. Actually I don't give a damn whether they "do or do not" (yoda quote.) My association is limited and so is my I care!
thedesertrat1 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > First off the Mormon church is an inamate object. > It is legally a corporation not a human. It can > neither think,talk, reason,sing...
Actually, this is not completely true. Non-religious corporations have provisions and safeguards specifically designed to prevent the company from being operated as an alter-ego of its President or some other powerful person within the company. This is not true of a Sole Corporation.
The mormon church is a Sole Corporation, registered as such under Utah law. The alter-ego who basically 'owns' the church during his tenure as the President of the sole corporation is currently Russell Nelson, who has the eccliasistical title of 'Prophet'. All of the Apostles and other general authorities could unite to vote against him and according to the laws of the state of Utah, Nelson's decisions would prevail. So as an alter-ego of the half-trillion dollar mormon empire, Russell Nelson 'is' the mormon church, at least until he dies or retires.
I hold Russel Nelson personally responsible for what the Mormon church is and what it does and has done, absent the appropriate official apologies. If he can remove the word "Mormon" from the church's name identity, he is capable of caughing-up some official apologies on behalf of his personal empire. If he can't even do that, he is not much of a man, not to mention being a false prophet.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/25/2020 10:22AM by azsteve.
azsteve Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I hold Russel Nelson personally responsible for > what the Mormon church is and what it does and has > done, absent the appropriate official apologies. > If he can remove the word "Mormon" from the > church's name identity, he is capable of > caughing-up some official apologies on behalf of > his personal empire.
So true. He risks being taken by God's servants instead of God only if he did something brave and heroic like attempting to end Joseph's Myth but what would that be like as a last act in life?
If I understand correctly, all of the Mormon Church's assets belong to the corporation sole, and only one person, the Trustee-in-Trust, can occupy that position. So technically, the incorporated office owns the assets, not Mr. Nelson. It's possible that church leaders could remove its president, through the presiding bishopric or a common council, and assets would remain in the incorporated office.