Posted by:
LDS Anarchist
(
)
Date: November 13, 2011 05:29PM
Lol. If I'm nuts, why are you all endlessly discussing a topic brought up by a crazy person?
Btw, that paragraph that you quoted is the most quoted paragraph of my entire blog. It pisses off both atheists and believers alike. Especially these immortal words:
"I believe that if the solid earth theory were true, it would reveal or bear record of the stupidity of the Lord."
Classic. Ageless. I expect that people will go on and on commenting about my words for the duration of the Internet.
Atheist and creationists alike accept that the Earth is solid on FAITH. There is no proof that the Earth, or any of the other planets, are hollow, but there is a lot of evidence that these worlds are hollow. Solid earth/planet theory IS still just a theory.
But it is a flawed theory because it DOES NOT account for the anomalies. What I wrote in that blog post (hollow earth + plasma cosmology) DOES account for the anomalies. And that's the key to the soundness of any particular theory. In other words, whatever theory you may have, does it address all of the anomalies? If the answer is, no, then your theory is a shit fantasy.
Now, I'm an anarchist, so go ahead and believe all the fantasy you want to believe. I don't want to take you out of your mental masturbation if it satisfies you. And I'll believe all the fantasy I want to believe, too. But, when discussing scientific evidence, let's keep the anomalies in mind, shall we?
See, what I have noticed since I wrote that post years ago is that all who are critical of it have not actually brought up the science and anomalies. They just critize without knowing what the hell the evidence for or against the solid earth theory is. They all accept the solid earth theory because this is what we've been taught in school, in other words, they accept their school traditions, kind of like the religionist accept their faith traditions, at face value, without actually digging up the evidence for and against and coming to an independent determination of whether these things are fact or fantasy.
Atheists are as ignorant as any religionist I've ever met. I actually went and looked at the facts and found that the facts don't add up. The solid earth theory doesn't account for the anomalies. Neither does the hollow earth theory, alone. But in combination with plasma science, IT DOES.
So, go ahead and call me crazy all you want. And I'll call you all ignorant fools. (Ignorant because you don't know your facts. Fools, because you criticize what you have not studied.) But if you want to appear to the Mormons or anyone else of a religious persuasion as credible, refute with evidence to the contrary and address the anomalies. Using this exmormon thread to just ridicule something without refuting the evidence is moronic. Now, I'm not saying that you shouldn't do it. On the congtrary, go ahead and do it. Morons ought ot have the freedom is expression, too. I'm just saying that no one is going to take you seriously if you just just ridicule without refuting the evidences brought forth. And I did bring forth evidences. I pointed people to a mountain of evidence in that post. That you or others didn't look does not change that fact.
Besides, if you guys really had a leg to stand on concerning the supposed truth of the earth being solid, why don't you go to my blog, read the evidences I pointed to, and refute them one by one there, in front of the entire blog's audience instead of coming here and masturbating each other by ridiculing me and what I wrote? And if I am ignorant fool, then set me straight by showing me how the solid earth theory does address the anomalies. But make sure that you do a good job, though, because there are people on my blog who will call you on your shit.